[HOME] - [2002] - [humour]


Subject: Who's the biggest Plonker on UKSF?
From: Michael Cunningham <superman@uksf.org.xspamblockx.uk>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:41:28 -0000

"Joe Horowitz" <jh007c3183NOSPAM@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aphdj7$1jg0v$1@ID-146919.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Victoria Barrett" <vbarrett@the-beach.net> wrote in message
> news:aphbf5$1hgeg$1@ID-121719.news.dfncis.de...
> > Come on ST, you're a bright lad, or so your mum tells me (that was your
> mum  
> > right? Had on a mac and some wellies, loitering around Russell Square).
> You  
> > figure it out.
>
> You're not calling Robert the 'Erbert a plonker, are you? Surely, if you
> are, "Who's the most dull and pointless troll UKSF has had since Scottie"
> would have been more clear. Yet another second-rate half-wit gets sent to
> UKSF by the trolling agency. When will they realise that we just don't have
> any use for them, REDEVIL, Red, Robbie, Scottie, any of those lot. What are
> we expected to _do_ with them? Completely useless. You can't entertain
> yourself picking on someone who thinks "On your knees, mediocrity" is a
> clever and scary thing to say. Well, not for very long anyway.
>
> "Trolltastic" are supposed to be the best damn trolling agency in all of
> usenet, but we've been signed up to them for two years now, and tbh, I don't
> think we've ever had our money's worth. Maybe it's time we thought about
> switching over to one of the smaller independent agencies, like
> "Dial-a-troll" or "Flame Exchange". They probably won't have half as many
> trolls on their books but the overall standard must surely be better. It
> can't be any worse.

Have you ever thought that Trolltastic aren't the real problem?  I hate to
say this but maybe we should be looking at ourselves here.  And if we
do start to look inwardly, I think we'll find that it's not the trolls that
are the problem -- It's us.

Look at 99% of active newsgroups in the world today-- They've got
successful trolls.  And I'm sure they don't have to shop around every trolling
agency to find them either.  But us?  Nothing.  It seems that we're incapable
of maintaining a troll for more than a week and even then, it was only because
Scotty was on half-term.  And ffs, at the end, he even started trying to be
_friends_ with us.  Wtf did we do to him?  Shameful.  Just shameful.

It's too easy to blame the trolling agencies for poor quality trolls.  RD,
Steph, Scotty, Robbie and the rest came very highly recommended and
had been very successful in other groups.  But typically, they were mistreated
in uksf and decided to quit within days.  If we don't change our ways, we're
going to grow old and troll-less and we'll have no-one to blame but
ourselves.


--
Mike

http://www.overanalyse.com



[HOME] - [2002] - [humour]


This page and all others hosted at this address ©UKSF 1997 the uk.sport.football archive.
No unauthorised transmission or reproduction of the content permitted.
If you experience problems with this site, please contact webmaster@uksf.org.uk